Discussion over Separate Surname Begins

Discussion over the bills for introducing selective separate surname for married couples began in Committee on Judicial Affairs of the House of Representatives on May 30th. Three opposition parties respectively proposed their own bills, none of which has achieved a majority support in the House, because ruling Liberal Democratic Party would not approve any of them. Regardless domestic and international requirements for separate surname, the Diet has been failing in guaranteeing diversity of married couples.

With decline of LDP power in the Diet after Lower House election in October 2024, the opposition parties accelerate their effort to catch the momentum for amendment of the Civil Code. The Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDPJ) submitted a bill in April, which included the points raised by the Legislative Council in 1996. The Democratic Party for the People (DPP) proposed their own bill that require a couple to name at their marriage the head of family register whose surname would be used for their children.

 

Japan Innovation Party (Nippon Ishin-no Kai) takes more conservative stance. Ishin’s bill does not allow separate surname, but create “common name” in family registration, which has legal status. The LDP abandoned to submit their own bill to current session of the Diet after long internal discussion over the issue. Some conservative lawmakers, including Sanae Takaichi, argue that using common name can be an alternative to separate surname. Komeito is positive in introduction of separate surname, but thinks it is too early to conclude this issue.

 

With no perspective that any one of those three bills would pass, the Chairwoman of Committee on Judicial Affairs, Chinami Nishimura (CDPJ), decided to begin discussion on separate surnames. Of all thirty-five seats in the committee, the opposition parties have nineteen. Two out of those nineteen oppose separate surnames. There is no hope that the opposition parties will be united to pass a bill.

 

If no one bill passes the Diet by the end of current session, all those bills will be discarded or passed over to next session. The chairwoman Nishimura is supposed to be aiming at having votes on the bills to make contrast between ayes and nays clear. In a poll of Kyodo News in May, 71 percent of responders supported introduction of selective separate surname, leaving 27 percent of the opponents far behind. Even if no bill passes the Diet, it will be good enough for the opposition parties to display the LDP against majority of the people before the Upper House election in July.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Struggle over a Hearing on Accounting Manager

Without a simple majority in the House of Representatives, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) struggles against the opposition parties on inviting former accounting manager of Abe faction to the Committee on Budget. While the oppositions hope to keep the issue alive until the Upper House election this summer, the LDP wants to terminate the prolonged discussion over the slush fund scandal. The committee still cannot determine the date to begin discussion on FY 2025 budget.   The public prosecutors indicted former accounting manager of Abe faction, Jun-ichiro Matsumoto, with charge of wrong reporting about kickback fund of the faction. Tokyo District Court  sentenced  Matsumoto last September three years of imprisonment with suspension of five years. Matsumoto requested the LDP not to invite him to the Diet, because he had already told about the scandal in the court and had no further information to reveal.   The opposition parties have been demanding a hearing ...
Read more

Dilemma between Alliance and Constitution

  In the new year ministerial online meeting, Japan and United States resolved to work together to deal with various challenges by China. In the Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee, or “2+2,” the ministers of both government, US Secretaries of State and Defense and Japanese Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Defense, expressed their concerns on Beijing’s efforts, which were recognized as undermining the rule-based order in Indo-Pacific region and the world. On possible countermeasures, however, there still is a possibility of constitutional dispute in Japan over the principle of exclusively defensive security policy. The ministers referred to their concern about China’s activities in the East and the West China Sea. They reaffirmed to apply Article V of US-Japan Treaty of mutual Cooperation and Security to the Senkaku Islands, and strongly objected to China’s unlawful maritime claims, militarization and coercive activities in the South China Sea. They did not forge...
Read more

Defense Minister Admits Problem of Civilian Control

Concerning a series of scandals coming out from the Ministry of Defense (MOD), both Houses of the Diet held a recess discussion on the issue on July 30. To the questions of the opposition parties on why the Minister of Defense, Minoru Kihara, did not know about the scandal for months, Kihara   admitted   the problem was about civilian control. Kihara refused his stepping down as the minister, abiding by a request from the Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, to take leadership for rebuilding up the ministry. The discussion was focused on fraudulent record of allowance for divers in Maritime Self-defense Force (MSDF). Although the criminal investigation unit of MSDF arrested four members over the fraudulence last November, Kihara insisted that he did not know about it until it was disclosed in July 12. An officer of MOD explained that the staffs did not report it to the minister, because the incident would not affect other organizations outside the Self-defense Force.   The oppo...
Read more