Grand Bench Decides on Same Sex Marriage

Third Petty Bench of the Supreme Court accepted six lawsuits on same sex marriage and handed them over to Grand Bench which makes important constitutional decisions. High Courts that made decisions on those cases have mostly been supportive for marriages of couples who share the same sex. If the Supreme Court sentences approval for same sex marriage, the government of Japan will need to guarantee them a right for married couples. 

Five high courts in Sapporo, Tokyo, Fukuoka, Nagoya and Osaka have made decisions on those lawsuits a couple of years ago. Tokyo High Court made different decisions in two of those six cases. Totally, five decisions recognized that the laws which do not approve same sex marriage would violate provisions of the Constitution of Japan. Only Tokyo High Court decided that current laws are constitutional in the second lawsuit in Tokyo.

 

Article 13 of the Constitution guarantees the people “right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness,” while Article 14 does equality under the law. “Marriage shall be based on the mutual consent of both sexes,” says Paragraph 1 of Article 24, and Paragraph 2 of the same article determines that “With regard to choice of spouse, property rights, inheritance, choice of domicile, divorce and other matters pertaining to marriage and the family, laws shall be enacted from the standpoint of individual dignity and the essential equality of the sexes.”

 

Sapporo High Court decided in March 2024 that current laws effectively denying same sex marriage would violate Article 14 and both paragraphs of Article 24, contemplating that the constitution approved same sex marriage as freedom of relationship between the people in light of dignity of individual. The decision of Fukuoka High Court in December 2024 found that a provision of the Civil Code that disregarded same sex marriage would violate Article 13 of the constitution.

 

On the other hand, Tokyo High Court solely ruled out same sex marriage. Based on the situation of society in Japan when the constitution was enacted in 1947, the court recognized that Article 24 supposed a marriage as relationship between a couple with different sex. It also argued that defining marriage from viewpoint of reproduction would be reasonable.

 

Although five sentences out of six of high courts’ decision approved same sex marriage, the government of Japan has not taken any measure to guarantee the same sex couples right for spouses. The Diet has also taken no action to legislate related laws. It is obvious that conservative lawmakers have been opposing same sex marriage, arguing that it would change traditional shape of families.

 

Japan Federation of Bar Associations submitted their opinion to the prime minister and speakers of both chambers of the Diet in 2019, which demanded the government to approve same sex marriage and to legislate laws for it. It is likely that the government of Japan will face stronger pressure for it, if the Supreme Court approve same sex marriage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LDP Kickoffs Presidential Election

Defense Ministers Meet in Seoul

Contaminated Soil to Prime Minister’s Residence