Discussion over NTT Law

The government of Japan once had three public corporations: railway, cigarette and telephone. They were privatized in 1980s, receiving the demand to cut the cost for them. When telephone corporation was privatized in 1985, establishing Nippon Telegram and Telephone Corporation (NTT), the government legislated NTT Law to vest the obligations to maintain universal telephone service everywhere in Japan and to disclose the achievement of the studies on telecommunication. The president of NTT, Akira Shimada, required Liberal Democratic Party to abolish NTT Law, hoping to be unleashed. There is a discussion in LDP to promote NTT reform for defense policy.

NTT Law was legislated at the time most telephone services were provided through the lines in office, home or pay phone booth. Now, most telephone users call through cell phone. According to the report of Nikkei Shimbun, contracts of using fixed-line phone decreased from 63 million in 1997 to 13 million in 2023. Cell phone contracts with big three companies are over 200 million this year.

 

For NTT, the obligation of the law on universal service is recognized as eroding its international competitiveness. In the meeting of LDP, Shimada required the abolishment of NTT Law with the reason that the law had finished its role. In the press conference after the meeting, Shimada hoped other telephone communication companies to owe some responsibility for service of fixed-line phone.

 

Other three companies, KDDI, Softbank and Rakuten, opposed abolishing NTT Law. With about one hundred and eighty companies, they submitted a request to LDP to deliberately consider the abolishment of NTT Law. NTT succeeded the infrastructure, such as telephone poles or office buildings, from the governmental corporation. Other companies argue that NTT should return those formerly public assets, if NTT Law is abolished. They are worried that the abolishment may cause unfair competition.

 

There is a discussion in LDP to require the government to sell its own NTT stocks for “complete privatization.” Yomiuri Shimbun reported that some of LDP lawmakers hoped that the benefit of selling those stocks could be contribute to appropriate for defense budget, which budgetary resource had not found. The idea of tax increase for defense budget is fundamentally unpopular.

 

Asahi Shimbun criticized the idea of selling NTT stocks in its editorials for defense. It argued that the review of NTT Law had to be done in the perspective of fair competition and utility of users. There can be a public discussion that the money obtained by selling NTT stocks should be used for other purpose than for defense. We have not seen an attempt of LDP to listen to the tax payers on the issue.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Amendment of Local Autonomy Law

Request for Final Nuclear Disposal Site

Not A Royal Wedding