Racist Speech Is Accused

Freedom of speech is guaranteed to everyone. But if it would harm someone, this human right can be restricted. Ignoring that basic principle in democracy or denying democracy itself, a member of House of Representatives Mio Sugita, who were affiliated to Liberal Democratic Party, reiterated discriminative speeches against ethnic minority publicly. Sapporo Legal Affairs Bureau recognized the Sugita’s three offensive posts online against Ainu people, as breaches of human rights. It is highly unusual that a Diet member, whose privileged status is constitutionally guaranteed, is legally accused of a speech.

 

Sapporo Legal Affairs Bureau, one of the local bodies of Ministry of Justice, avoided “taking measures” against Sugita on her violation of human rights, but issued an “enlightenment” to her. The bureau recommended Sugita to study more about Ainu culture and be careful about her speech. Sugita has not commented on the issue. As long as Sugita is a member of House of Representatives elected in the election with official recognition of LDP, LDP is responsible for her speech.

 

When Sugita participated in a meeting of United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, she posted on Twitter and other social networking services that “Even Hanbok or cosplayer aunts wearing Ainu ethnic cloths appeared. It was completely a problem on their dignity. Breathing the same air got me down to the extent my body condition was exacerbated when I left the place.”

 

When she was asked about the post by an opposition member of Ayaka Shiomura (CDP) in a Diet session last November, Sugita admitted the fact and denied her responsibility because she had not been a lawmaker at the time. “There were a hundred of such people surrounding and scolding me. It must be natural such an ordinary person as me to have that kind of impression,” explained Sugita.

 

There is no rule that a person surrounded and scolded can insult someone’s personality publicly. Although Shiomura asked whether the posts would be defined as hate speeches, a staff from Ministry of Justice said that it was hard to answer on the issue, because she didn’t know the details about it. Prime Minister Kishida followed that not allowing hate speech would be a proper attitude for the government. This was the answer from an administration which upheld no tolerance to hate speech.

 

The response of the government on the issuance of enlightenment was dry. “As a general meaning, there should not be any discrimination with the reason of being ethnically an Ainu,” told Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirokazu Matsuno in his press conference. The deputy secretary general of Ainu Association of Sapporo Ryoko Tahara, who asked the bureau a relief on the human rights violation, hopes that the bureau’s decision marks the first step toward a normal society without discrimination.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Amendment of Local Autonomy Law

Request for Final Nuclear Disposal Site

Not A Royal Wedding