LDP and JIP Differ on Nuclear Sharing
A survey on 1,285 candidates of the Lower House election conducted by Mainichi Shimbun found that a large part of candidates of Japan Innovation Party (JIP), the coalition partner of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), hoped Japan to consider nuclear sharing, which meant joint operation of nuclear weapons with the United States. It revealed a major difference in nuclear policy between JIP and LDP, which may affect formation of the coalition after the election.
The question was whether Japan should possess nuclear weapons, should not possess them but should consider nuclear sharing or should neither possess nor consider them. Among JIP candidates, 91 percent answered that Japan should consider nuclear sharing with the U.S. The party includes in its campaign platform “beginning of discussion on nuclear sharing,” revision of Japan’s pacifistic principle, exclusively defense-oriented policy, and enhancement of Japan’s deterrence with constitutional amendment. Hawkish JIP identifies itself as “accel pedal of the LDP.”
However, LDP candidates are not so enthusiastic on hawkish agenda. 49 percent of LDP candidates believe that Japan should neither possess nuclear weapons nor consider nuclear sharing. The ratio of candidates who thought Japan should consider nuclear sharing was 35 percent, showing apparent contrast with JIP. Although Takaichi considers revision of three non-nuclear principles, especially the third principle of “not bringing nuclear weapons in” rather than other two, not producing and not possessing.
The LDP and JIP also differ over management of political money. While 98 percent of JIP candidates argued that donation from companies and organizations should totally be prohibited, 84 percent of LDP candidates did not recognize necessity of banning them. After slash fund scandal in LDP factions was revealed in 2023, the party suffered from serious defeats in consecutive two elections in 2024 and 2025. Although JIP had been raising banning that donations at the top of its policy priority, it stopped accusing the LDP after it decided to form a leading coalition with the LDP.
In the questions to opposition candidates, the Centrist Reform Alliance (CRA) showed certain integration on constitutional amendment. Although the CRA candidates were split over the amendment with 41 percent of yes and 39 percent of no, 76 percent of them were against changing Article 9. Even most candidates of former Komeito were against revision of the pacifist provision.
83 percent of CRA candidates thought that dependence of Japan’s energy on nuclear power should be reduced as much as possible. Although the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan had been advocating a society without nuclear power plant, the CRA decided to approve resumption of some plants. They reached a concession in which they focus on reduction of nuclear power plant as much as they can.
Comments
Post a Comment