Revised Political Funds Control Act Passed the Diet

The House of Councillors approved the revised Political Funds Control Act, supported by the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito. Having been approved in the House of Representatives earlier this month, the bill passed the Diet and the law will be enacted from January 2026. The opposition parties sharply opposed the new law, denouncing the bill as full of loopholes.

The LDP submitted the bill in May after it faced broad public skepticisms on the slush fund scandal. After the submission, the LDP further revised the bill, accepting request from Kometo, to lower the threshold of disclosing information of purchaser of fundraising party tickets from ¥100,000 to ¥50,000. However, the revied bill has no annual limit for how many parties a lawmaker can have.

 

The LDP also added a clause that the disclosure of receipts on the spending of “policy activity fund,” the money from a party to its leaders without disclosing how it was used, should be made open ten years later. The clause was requested by Nippon Ishin no Kai (Japan Innovation Party). The top leaders of Ishin and the LDP made a deal that the LDP would achieve another reform in Houses’ allowance for each lawmaker by the end of this session to get Ishin’s support for the LDP bill. But the LDP abandoned Ishin’s reform, because time was running out. Infuriated Ishin turned its back to the LDP and voted against the LDP bill in the Upper House.

 

Missing report on spendings of the policy activity fund will be prescribed after five years have passed. Even if the case is found ten years after, the politician will no longer be indicted because of the five-year prescription. With an unexpected help from Ishin, the LDP could passed the bill with a great loophole. Although the LDP explained that it would set an annual limit on the spending of the policy activity fund, the details are still “under consideration.”

 

The new law will impose each lawmaker to submit “certification” of the record of political funds, and the lawmaker will be disfranchised, if the certification is wrong. However, the lawmaker will not be charged, if the accounting manager have been making a lie. The lawmaker can always escape its responsibility, attributing everything to the manager.

 

Transferring fund from an organization with strict rules for disclosure to another one with softer regulation will be closely watched under the new law. But there is no limit of how many organizations one lawmaker can establish. The LDP also proposed building third-party observation organization for checking political fund. But when and what kind of the organization will be built is “under consideration.”

 

The opposition parties criticized the bill as unworthy for a political reform. 77 percent regarded the bill as inefficient for preventing the same kind of scandal in the future in the poll of Asahi Shimbun in mid-June. 83 percent did not approve the handlings of the slush fund scandal by Kishida. It is obvious that the passing of new law will not raise the approval rate of current administration.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Amendment of Local Autonomy Law

The House of Representatives started discussion on revision of the Local Autonomy Law, which would vest the national government a power to instruct local government in an emergency. It may change the relationship between the national and local government, which has been recognized as equal. The opposition parties oppose the amendment, arguing that it would give the national government an excessive power.   With the Meiji Restoration, the national government abolished the feudal system, introducing modern governance. However, its autonomy was not sufficient. The governor of each prefecture was appointed by the national government. The local governments subordinated to the national government. It was as late as 2000 when  the Comprehensive Decentralization Law  was enacted and the relationship between the national and local government was defined as equal.   The national government found inconvenience in the relationship between the national and local government, when COVID-19 was preval
Read more

Request for Final Nuclear Disposal Site

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry requested Genkai Town, Saga, to accept “literature survey” for building a final disposal site for high-level radioactive waste. Genkai is going to answer within this month. If it accepts, it will be the third place to accept that survey, following two places in Hokkaido. Main reason to accept the survey is supposed to be subsidy from the national government.   Japan has no final disposal site. Among all 54 reactors in 17 nuclear power generation plant, 12 reactors of 6 plants are operating. The rest of them are not in operation, some of which are determined to be decommissioned. Used nuclear fuels are stocked in each plant, 　 or have sent to a reprocessing plant in Rokkasho, Aomori. There are two plans to stock nuclear wastes in the intermediate facility for disposal, one is already built and another is still in negotiation.   Nuclear Fuel Final Disposal Act in 2000 determines to bury nuclear waste in the underground. Literature survey, which is
Read more

Death Penalty Demanded on Criminal of Arson

On the historically brutal case of arson, the public prosecutors demanded an ultimate penalty to the offender. In the trial on the arson and murder in Kyoto Animation in 2019, the prosecutors requested death penalty on the defendant, Shinji Aoba. The lawyers of Aoba argued that the court should avoid sentencing death penalty. The judgement will be passed next January. Aoba was indicted as putting fire after pouring gasoline in the building of Kyoto Animation (Kyoani), a studio producing animation works, and killed 36 staffs and injured 32 on July 18 th , 2019. In the trial, Aoba argued that he could not tolerate Kyoani, because it had stolen his novel story in its works. Aoba later apologized to the victim’s families that he had done too much and regretted it.   In the closing argument in Kyoto Regional Court, the prosecutors demanded death penalty for Aoba, because the number of victims were extremely high in the history of criminal trials in Japan. “It is hard to describe about how t
Read more