Non-confidence Resolution Rejected

The House of Representatives rejected the non-confidence resolution against the Cabinet led by Prime Minister Fumio Kishida on June 20. The resolution submitted by the Constitutional Democratic Party accused of the slush fund scandal as unprecedented case over political fund and of Kishida’s lack of leadership to investigate the overall structure of the false management. Although all the opposition parties, including Japan Innovation Party which voted yes to the LDP’s bill of revising Political Funds Control Act (PFCA), the resolution was dismissed by the majority of LDP and Komeito.

Non-confidence resolution is a power vested only on the Lower House based on Article 69 of the Constitution of Japan. If the House passes a non-confidence resolution, or rejects a confidence resolution, the Cabinet will resign en masse, unless the House is dissolved within ten days.

 

There are only four cabinets under current constitution that received non-confidence resolution passed the House: the Cabinet of Shigeru Yoshida in 1948 and 1953, of Masayoshi Ohira in 1980 and of Kiichi Miyazawa in 1993. In each of those cases, the House was dissolved and had a general election. Prime Minister’s usual countermeasure against non-confidence resolution is a snap election.

 

The resolution needs 50 signs of the house members to be submitted to the Speaker. The Chairman of Diet Affairs Committee of CDP, Jun Azumi, submitted the non-confidence resolution against Kishida Cabinet with other nine members of his party. 50 names of the lawmakers, mainly with CDP, were attached to it. Raising loopholes in the revised PFCA, the resolution denounced the bill as far less than political reform, attributing that insufficiency to irresponsibility of Kishida.

 

Non-confidence resolution is the biggest opportunity for the opposition parties to accuse current administration, being allowed once in a Diet session. If the resolution is rejected, it means that the House approved current Cabinet. The opposition parties thus deliberate whether the timing of submitting the resolution is the most effective to give political damage on the prime minister. The CDP submitted the resolution against Kishida right after the revised PFCA passed the Diet.

 

It was not surprising that the resolution was rejected, even how the CDP hoped some LDP lawmakers to vote yes and pass the House. The vote was made strictly along with party line. However, the opposition parties argued that Kishida was not fit for the leader in their debate before the voting. “The scandal of secret fund was very serious incident, which undermine the people’s confidence on politics. But Kishida does not recognize this seriousness,” said Kenta Izumi, the head of CDP, in the debate.

 

An LDP lawmaker, Kozaburo Nishime, defended his party in the debate as responsibly passed the revised PFCA bill. However, one of the LDP lawmakers, Jun Tsushima, criticized Kishida in a party meeting just before the plenary session of the Lower House for voting on the non-confidence resolution. “Should President Kishida need to be here to tell something to us? Why isn’t he here?” said Tsushima. The scene represented fundamental frustration in LDP against Kishida’s leadership.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Amendment of Local Autonomy Law

The House of Representatives started discussion on revision of the Local Autonomy Law, which would vest the national government a power to instruct local government in an emergency. It may change the relationship between the national and local government, which has been recognized as equal. The opposition parties oppose the amendment, arguing that it would give the national government an excessive power.   With the Meiji Restoration, the national government abolished the feudal system, introducing modern governance. However, its autonomy was not sufficient. The governor of each prefecture was appointed by the national government. The local governments subordinated to the national government. It was as late as 2000 when  the Comprehensive Decentralization Law  was enacted and the relationship between the national and local government was defined as equal.   The national government found inconvenience in the relationship between the national and local government, when COVID-19 was preval
Read more

Request for Final Nuclear Disposal Site

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry requested Genkai Town, Saga, to accept “literature survey” for building a final disposal site for high-level radioactive waste. Genkai is going to answer within this month. If it accepts, it will be the third place to accept that survey, following two places in Hokkaido. Main reason to accept the survey is supposed to be subsidy from the national government.   Japan has no final disposal site. Among all 54 reactors in 17 nuclear power generation plant, 12 reactors of 6 plants are operating. The rest of them are not in operation, some of which are determined to be decommissioned. Used nuclear fuels are stocked in each plant, 　 or have sent to a reprocessing plant in Rokkasho, Aomori. There are two plans to stock nuclear wastes in the intermediate facility for disposal, one is already built and another is still in negotiation.   Nuclear Fuel Final Disposal Act in 2000 determines to bury nuclear waste in the underground. Literature survey, which is
Read more

Death Penalty Demanded on Criminal of Arson

On the historically brutal case of arson, the public prosecutors demanded an ultimate penalty to the offender. In the trial on the arson and murder in Kyoto Animation in 2019, the prosecutors requested death penalty on the defendant, Shinji Aoba. The lawyers of Aoba argued that the court should avoid sentencing death penalty. The judgement will be passed next January. Aoba was indicted as putting fire after pouring gasoline in the building of Kyoto Animation (Kyoani), a studio producing animation works, and killed 36 staffs and injured 32 on July 18 th , 2019. In the trial, Aoba argued that he could not tolerate Kyoani, because it had stolen his novel story in its works. Aoba later apologized to the victim’s families that he had done too much and regretted it.   In the closing argument in Kyoto Regional Court, the prosecutors demanded death penalty for Aoba, because the number of victims were extremely high in the history of criminal trials in Japan. “It is hard to describe about how t
Read more