Shimomura in the Diet Hearing

One of the former leaders of Abe faction in the Liberal Democratic Party, Hakubun Shimomura, appeared at the hearing on kickback fund scandal in the Lower House Committee on Budget on May 27th. Denying instruction for resuming the kickback fund, Shimomura admitted that he suggested a fact that there were some requests in the faction hoping to resume it. It is likely that the illegal funding, which had once been abolished, was resumed with Shimomura’s “reporting” of some voices in the faction. 

The kickback fund had been a usual practice in Abe faction. A member who sold tickets of the faction’s fundraising party receives the return for the sales beyond quota. It was made in secret without reporting to the government by the faction or each lawmaker. The secrecy constructed violation of Political Funds Control Act. Although the practice was abolished in April 2022, it was resumed after a meeting of the faction leaders in August 2022.

 

Shimomura, who lost his seat of the House of Representatives in election last October, is one of the leaders in the meeting. The accounting manager of the faction, Jun-ichiro Matsumoto, has told that he was instructed by one of those leaders to resume the kickback in the meeting at which the resumption was decided. Shimomura denied his instruction and told that resumption was not decided in the meeting.

 

Matsumoto indicated that the leader who made that instruction was no longer a member of the Diet. That condition was applied only to Shimomura or Ryu Shionoya, former chairman of Abe faction, among the leaders in the meeting.

 

In the hearing of Budget Committee in the House of Representatives, Shimomura explained that he told Matsumoto about some requests in the faction in late June and late July 2022. “I had no intention to demand resumption of kickback. If it was regarded as an instruction, it would be my moral fault,” said Shimomura in the committee.

 

The fact is simple. Shimomura told Matsumoto about frustrations of faction members. Matsumoto received it as instruction to resume the kickback. Shimomura thought that he told it to Matsumoto in a way not demanding resumption of the kickback. It is not unusual for two people to have different perception about their conversation. In the testimony at Lower House Political Ethics Council in March 2024, Shimomura said that he did not know at all how the kickback had been resumed.

 

In short, Shimomura and Matsumoto are pushing responsibility on each other. At the time, Shimomura was a veteran lawmaker and Matsumoto was not more than a manager of the faction. It was obvious that Shimomura had larger political power than Matsumoto. It is understandable that Matsumoto felt pressured by Shimomura. But, the kickback was actually resumed after August 2022.

 

The scandal caused serious defeat of the LDP in the election of October 2024. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba failed in implementing his promise to settle the issue of political donation from companies and organizations. Slow progress in political reform keeps on disturbing Ishiba administration to regain power.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Struggle over a Hearing on Accounting Manager

Without a simple majority in the House of Representatives, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) struggles against the opposition parties on inviting former accounting manager of Abe faction to the Committee on Budget. While the oppositions hope to keep the issue alive until the Upper House election this summer, the LDP wants to terminate the prolonged discussion over the slush fund scandal. The committee still cannot determine the date to begin discussion on FY 2025 budget.   The public prosecutors indicted former accounting manager of Abe faction, Jun-ichiro Matsumoto, with charge of wrong reporting about kickback fund of the faction. Tokyo District Court  sentenced  Matsumoto last September three years of imprisonment with suspension of five years. Matsumoto requested the LDP not to invite him to the Diet, because he had already told about the scandal in the court and had no further information to reveal.   The opposition parties have been demanding a hearing ...
Read more

Dilemma between Alliance and Constitution

  In the new year ministerial online meeting, Japan and United States resolved to work together to deal with various challenges by China. In the Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee, or “2+2,” the ministers of both government, US Secretaries of State and Defense and Japanese Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Defense, expressed their concerns on Beijing’s efforts, which were recognized as undermining the rule-based order in Indo-Pacific region and the world. On possible countermeasures, however, there still is a possibility of constitutional dispute in Japan over the principle of exclusively defensive security policy. The ministers referred to their concern about China’s activities in the East and the West China Sea. They reaffirmed to apply Article V of US-Japan Treaty of mutual Cooperation and Security to the Senkaku Islands, and strongly objected to China’s unlawful maritime claims, militarization and coercive activities in the South China Sea. They did not forge...
Read more

Defense Minister Admits Problem of Civilian Control

Concerning a series of scandals coming out from the Ministry of Defense (MOD), both Houses of the Diet held a recess discussion on the issue on July 30. To the questions of the opposition parties on why the Minister of Defense, Minoru Kihara, did not know about the scandal for months, Kihara   admitted   the problem was about civilian control. Kihara refused his stepping down as the minister, abiding by a request from the Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, to take leadership for rebuilding up the ministry. The discussion was focused on fraudulent record of allowance for divers in Maritime Self-defense Force (MSDF). Although the criminal investigation unit of MSDF arrested four members over the fraudulence last November, Kihara insisted that he did not know about it until it was disclosed in July 12. An officer of MOD explained that the staffs did not report it to the minister, because the incident would not affect other organizations outside the Self-defense Force.   The oppo...
Read more