Revision of Death Penalty Gets Momentum

Japan is one of a few developed countries that still embraces death penalty in legal system. Possibly due to highly exclusive system in indictment of criminal cases, it appears that excessive investigation causes wrong penalties on suspects, such as Iwao Hakamada who survived from death row with wrong charge. Discussion over abolishment of death penalty gets momentum in Japan. 

In the case of Hakamada, he was arrested with suspicion of murder in 1966 and sentenced to death in 1980. Hakamada repeatedly requested retrial, arguing that he was innocent. After some series of trials, the court concluded that the public prosecutors fabricated evidences for Hakamada’s involvement in the murder. Although the government did not execute Hakamada, his lifetime in prison, which occupied most of his life, cannot be taken back. Exposed to threat of death for a long time, Hakamada suffers from heavy mental disease with incapability of communication.

 

A non-government conference by experts of criminal law, lawmakers, families of executed prisoners wrapped up their proposal on death penalty in Japan in November, which concluded that death penalty cannot be remaining the same in contemporary legal system. The conference requested the government to establish a body for fundamental discussion over death penalty, suggesting abolishment of it.

 

The proposal argues that death penalty is eroding national interest of Japan, concerning the fact that about seventy percent of all the countries, especially European nations, have abolished death penalty. The conference reported that only three countries of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Japan, Republic of Korea and the United States, still have death penalty. However, ROK suspended execution from 1998, and 29 states in the U.S. abolished death penalty.

 

The United Nations Special Rapporteurs of Human Rights Council demanded in November the government of Japan to review method of execution, currently prescribed to be hanging, and to consider suspension of execution. They called on Japan “to consider establishing a moratorium on death penalty.” The rapporteurs called death penalty “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.”

 

The report of experts also denied deterrence of death penalty on crimes. It argues that there is no evidence of crimes increasing in countries that have abolished death penalty, the deterrence would be related to ratio of arresting crimes, not cruelty of punishment, and it only works when a criminal is in a state of rationality. It also raises possibility of crime with aspiration for death.

 

On proposals of the experts, Chief Cabinet Secretary, Yoshimasa Hayashi, dismissed the request for discussion body in the government, arguing abolishment of death penalty was inappropriate. Hayashi raised some result of polls which indicated that most people thought death penalty as an unavoidable punishment, without commenting about possibility of false accusation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Amendment of Local Autonomy Law

Request for Final Nuclear Disposal Site

Not A Royal Wedding